The Governor of Benue State, Samuel Ortom, on Thursday refuted allegations of a rift between the G5 – five Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors abstinent from campaigns for the party’s presidential campaign, Atiku Abubakar.
The Benue governor, in a statement by his Special Adviser, Media and Publicity, Terver Akase, described an online medium as peddling barefaced lies.
“The publication ‘quoted’ Governor Ortom as saying that the four members of the G-5 were in sharp disagreement with Governor Wike for opting to support the All Progressives Congress presidential candidate, Bola Tinubu against the earlier decision of the group to support Labour Party candidate, Peter Obi,” the statement reads
“The said publication is apparently the handiwork of those who hate to see the G-5 together. The quotations attributed to Governor Ortom in the report are as fictitious as the publication itself. Those who want to see the G-5 split have run out of ideas and resorted to manufacturing fake news against the group.”
According to the statement, Ortom has always stated that the G5 is not pursuing personal interests.
READ ALSO:
- Buhari Arrives Daura Ahead Of Elections
- Military Destroy 61 Illegal Refineries, Apprehend 142 Suspects in Niger Delta
- Naira Redesign Policy Brought ‘Enormous Hardship’ To Nigerians; Senate President, Lawan Says
The governor noted that though members of the group may have peculiarities in their opinions about the presidential candidates, “they remain united and committed to justice, equity and fairness as the hallmarks of democracy”.
What the G5 stands for is beyond the 2023 elections, he added.
“We advise the general public to disregard the publication and the statements credited to Governor Ortom as contained in it,” Ortom said.
The G5 which includes Samuel Ortom (Benue), Nyesom Wike (Rivers), Seyi Makinde (Oyo), Okezie Ikepazu (Abia), and Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi (Enugu) have been at loggerheads with the leadership of the People’s Democratic Party, PDP, over the insistence of Iyorcha Ayu, the national chairman of the party to resign.
Their claim was on the basis that both the presidential candidate and the national chairman of the party can not come from the same zone.